Isn't it interesting, then, how various artists can view that same objective reality so differently?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02ec2/02ec261b3ba2a40997f5d8eee4d73d2d37830ff4" alt=""
A map of Florida from Walt Disney's Dumbo, with storks parachuting baby animals down on the circus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f488/8f488e191d5f819545344dd9f960b8390f3337a8" alt=""
The earth as a jester, with cautionary Latin maxims.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adc9d/adc9d0c37be4e77fd460e7ade2cac0f7fa99cd7f" alt=""
New York City as a huge penis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97a5c/97a5ce5dc0206f56c8bc93ccadf4e6693e4ec6dd" alt=""
A map of London from the 1851 World's Fair
The earth may appear constant to a farmer or an engineer building a road. A map maker has tools and standards to depict the earth as objectively as possible. Artists look at the same object, but what a blaze of creativity in their responses!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce9e6/ce9e67431fcc872cab57fbcae9ab03f38c53a8e6" alt=""
The earth as perceived in 1940s romantic fiction, where the single most important thing on the planet is that rendezvous with your true love
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2b4/da2b4dcb50342fb55319c85b5141f08fe0c9c034" alt=""
A 15th century map of the earth